• Role And Functions Of Business Incubators
• 2006 State Of The Business Incubation Industry Pdf Editor 2017
• 2006 State Of The Business Incubation Industry Pdf Editor Pdf

Employees at work in a business incubator in.A business incubator is a company that helps new and to develop by providing services such as. The National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) defines business incubators as a catalyst tool for either regional or national economic development.

NBIA categorizes their members’ incubators by the following five incubator types: academic institutions; non-profit development corporations; for-profit property development ventures; venture capital firms, and combination of the above.Business incubators differ from research and technology in their dedication to and early-stage companies. Research and technology parks, on the other hand, tend to be large-scale projects that house everything from corporate, government or university labs to very small companies. Most research and technology parks do not offer business assistance services, which are the hallmark of a business incubation program. However, many research and technology parks house incubation programs.Incubators also differ from the Small Business Development Centers (and similar business support programs) in that they serve only selected clients.

Congress created the Small Business Administration in the Small Business Act of July 30, 1953. Its purpose is to 'aid, counsel, assist and protect, insofar as is possible, the interests of small business concerns.' In addition, the charter ensures that small businesses receive a 'fair proportion' of any government contracts and sales of surplus property.

Role And Functions Of Business Incubators

SBDCs work with any small business at any stage of development, not only startup companies. Many business incubation programs partner with their local SBDC to create a 'one-stop shop' for entrepreneurial support.Within European Union countries there are different EU and state funded programs that offer support in form of consulting, mentoring, prototype creation and other services and co-funding for them. TecHub is one of examples for IT companies and ideas.In India, the business incubators are promoted in a varied fashion: as Technology Business Incubators (TBI) and as Startup Incubators - the first deals with technology business (mostly, consultancy and promoting technology related businesses) and the later deals with promoting startups (with more emphasis on establishing new companies, scaling the businesses, prototyping, patenting, and so forth).

The mission on creating specific innovations among the young minds of researchers via. 101 specialized incubators has been boosted in various parts of India through AIM-India. For instance, AIC-IIITKottayam, a Startup-based Incubator, specializes in IoT Cloud research jointly with world class incubators from Germany, USA, Austria, and so forth.

Due to a lack of valid and reliable scales, few studies have sought to describe and measure the business incubation process. After rigorously developing and pre-testing scales intended to measure the incubation process (Study A), we collected data from 53 incubators operating in the US in order to (a) systematically examine the incubation process, and (b) validate the scales. Accordingly, this study offers (1) new, validated scales for measuring the process of incubating new ventures, (2) empirically-based refinements to a theoretical model of the incubation process, and (3) data on business incubation outcomes that are very useful for incubator planning and benchmarking purposes.

2006 State Of The Business Incubation Industry Pdf Editor 2017

These experts had (a) industry experience related to operating business incubators, and/or (b) experience conducting research on business incubators. Demographically, these experts included three women and nine men; all were American citizens. Four were incubator managers, four were scholars, and four were “pracademics” (i.e., they had ties to both academia and work related to facilitating new venture development). These experts have theoretical and empirical understandings of the research topic and in a broad sense are representative of the sample of respondents targeted for the field study. 5. The incubator population targeted for the pilot study breaks down as follows: 50% mixed-use, 33% high-tech, 8% bio-tech and 8% empowerment. For a comparison of our entire sample with the sample of a recent NBIA study.

Incubation industry stakeholders frequently describe their incubators in terms of the types of clients that they incubate, and this convention was observed while sampling incubators for this study. For example, Sherman identifies three categories in this tenant-based taxonomy: mixed-use, high-technology, and empowerment (Sherman ) Briefly, mixed-use incubators incubate any type of tenant; high-technology incubators incubate technology-based firms; and empowerment incubators incubate firms established by members of socio-economically disadvantaged groups. While Sherman did not address the taxonomical category of bio-technology incubators in his study, it is evident by the separate tracks given to high-tech and bio-tech incubators, respectively, at the NBIA annual conference for the past few years that these two categories are perceived to be distinct by the incubator managers themselves. 10.

Level of Incubator Development classifications were originally developed by Allen. In the start-up stage, the primary concern of the business incubator manager is achieving full occupancy in order to reduce overhead costs. Weak, rent-paying companies meeting only a modicum of selection criteria may be allowed to enter the business incubator despite being a bad fit for incubation. In the business development stage, demand for space within the business incubator is greater than supply, and selection criteria can be applied with greater rigor. In the Mature stage, the business incubator has integrated itself with the community to a high degree, attracting resources, community support and significantly more demand for space in the incubator than supply. 12. By way of comparison, the NBIA’s latest statistics ( accessed 02/01/05) indicate that 44% of business incubators draw their clients from urban areas, 31% from rural areas and 16% from suburban areas.

The NBIA study does not report on incubators that draw incubatees on a regional basis. Discussions with incubators identifying themselves as drawing incubatees on a regional basis suggested their tendency to expand their market searches beyond their local area was due an insufficient number of desirable potential incubatees close to home or to the fact that they are the only incubator in the region and are attempting to service regional demand for their services. Differences between the sample and the NBIA sample may reflect the fact that the author physically visited most of the participants, whereas the NBIA study involved a self-administered online-survey without visits. 13. SPMA3 was selected for removal because during the course of the pilot testing several respondents felt that it was ambiguous and requested clarification. During the field tests it became apparent through conversations with the incubator managers that high-tech incubator managers viewed the question in terms of technical expertise related to the innovation the incubatee was attempting to commercialize while mixed-use incubator managers viewed the item as measuring the office IT skills of the incubatee. Since the item appeared to measure different things to different incubator managers it was removed.

15. A report for the Japan Association of New Business Incubation Organizations (JANBO): Summary of the U.S. Incubator industry.

Athens, OH: National Business Incubation Association.Bearse, P. A question of evaluation: NBIA’s impact assessment of business incubators. Economic Development Quarterly, 12(4), 322–333.Creswell, J. Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence.

New York: Wiley.Curran, P. G., & Finch, J. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.DeVellis, R.

Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed., Vol. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.Dillman, D. Mail and telephone surveys. New York: Wiley Interscience.Fowler, Jr. Survey research methods (2 ed., Vol. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D.

A real options-driven theory of business incubation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 41–54.Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. A systematic review of business incubation research.

The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). US: Prentice Hall.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D.

The strategy-focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Lewis-Beck, M. Data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Malhotra, A., & Grover, V. An assessment of research in POM: From constructs to theory.

Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 407–425.Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 411–433.Morrison, A., & Wensley, R.

Boxed up or boxed in? A short history of the Boston Consulting Group growth/share matrix. Journal of Marketing Management, 7, 105–129.NBIA (2002). State of the business incubation industry. Athens, OH, NBIA Publications.Peters, L., Rice, M.

P., & Sundararajan, M. The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83–91.Podsakoff, P.

M., & Organ, D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.Rice, M. P., & Matthews, J.

Growing new ventures, creating new jobs: Principles and practices of successful business incubation. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Rosenzweig, E. Navigating business-to-business (B2B) marketplaces (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.Sherman, H. Assessing the intervention effectiveness of business incubation programs on new business start-ups. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 117–133.Simsek, Z., & Veiga, J.

A primer on internet organizational surveys. Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 218–235.Stanton, J. An empirical assessment of data collection using the internet. Personnel Psychology, 51, 709–725.Stanton, J. M., & Rogelberg, S. Using internet/intranet pages to collect organizational research data. Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 200–217.Stephenson, W.

Letter to the editor: Technique of factor analysis. Nature 136, 297.Stratman, J. K., & Roth, A. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: Two-stage multi-item scale development and validation. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 601–628.References For Appendices.Allen, D.

2006 State Of The Business Incubation Industry Pdf Editor Pdf

N., & McCluskey, R. Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 15(2), 61–77.Allen, D.

N., & Rahman, S. Small business incubators: A positive environment for entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 23(3), 12–22.Allen, D. N., & Weinberg, M. State investment in business incubators. Public Administration Quarterly, 12(2), 196–215.Ansoff, H. Corporate strategy: An analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion.

New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Autio, E., & Kloftsen, M. A comparative study of two European business incubators. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 30–43.Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.Campbell, C. Change agents in the new economy: Business incubators and economic development. Economic Development Review, 7(2), 56–59.Chrisman, J.

Strategic, administrative, and operating assistance: The value of outside consulting to pre-venture entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(6), 401–418.